« April 2007 | Main | June 2007 »

May 31, 2007

Oklahoma lawmakers seek to prevent microchipping, not promote it

oklahoma-flag.jpg

Interesting legislative goings on in Oklahoma around human chipping.

Oklahoma State Sen. Brian Crain and Rep. Sue Tibbs are the authors of a bill opposing the microchipping of people, SB 47. It passed out of the state Senate in March and has been making its way through committee. Creepily, it was apparently amended to allow for the microchipping of criminals, but calmer heads are prevailing and that provision has now been stricken (see article below). One interesting human interest note: Rep. Tibbs is a 73 year-old grandmother.

While I am pleased to see these legislative efforts (Liz and I submitted testimony in favor of the bill), we need to let lawmakers nationwide know about our Bodily Integrity Act. It covers all the bases and is urgently needed before society becomes numb to the violation these chips represent.

Our model bill is just one page long and written in plain English.
http://www.antichips.com/legislation.htm

-Katherine Albrecht

========================================================
House rejects microchip implants for violent criminals
By Tim Talley Associated Press Writer
http://www.examiner-enterprise.com/articles/2007/05/24/news/state/news440.txt

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — Legislation that would authorize microchip implants in people convicted of violent crimes was sent back to a committee for more work Wednesday after state House members questioned whether the proposal would violate constitutional civil liberties.

The measure, approved by the Senate, authorizes microchip implants for persons convicted of one or more of 19 violent offenses who have to serve at least 85 percent of their sentence, including murder, rape and some forms of robbery and burglary, while prohibiting government from requiring microchips implants in anyone else.

The tiny electronic implants are commonly used to keep track of pets and livestock, but several House members questioned whether their forced use in people would be unconstitutionally invasive.

"We are going down that slippery slope," said Rep. Ed Cannaday, D-Porum.

Lawmakers never voted on the measure. During debate, its author, Rep. Sue Tibbs, R-Tulsa, asked that it be sent back to a joint House-Senate conference committee where the exception for violent offenders was inserted.

Cannaday and others said the measure may violate the Fourth, Fifth And Fourteenth amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, the Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment and the Fourteenth Amendment contains the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses.

"I see it as invasive," Cannaday said. He said many sex offenders and prisoners convicted of other crimes are already required to wear wrist or ankle bracelets when they are released from prison so their movements can be monitored by satellite tracking devices.

##

Posted by Katherine Albrecht at 8:36 AM | Comments (1)

Future Flop: HP's New Shopping Assistant

hp-shopping-assistant.jpg

In its latest much-ado-about-nothing press release, HP has unveiled an in-store kiosk designed to keep track of your purchase history and offer you coupons. *Yawn*

People don't want this in their stores. I don't see how they can continue to develop this "new idea" year after year after year.

When you go shopping you just want to find what you want and get out, not play with the latest in-store technology. If it's playing with technology you want, you'll go home and connect your brain to a video game, not peer intently into a coupon kiosk or interact with a klunky laptop strapped to your grocery cart. These systems will never take off. Not because they are invasive, but because they're a pain.

That's why the industry wants the automatic data capture capacity of RFID readers in entrances and spychips in loyalty cards. That's the only way they can be sure of getting people's data when their other schemes fail.

Of course, all of this watching will be good for stores and bad for consumers, as John Vanderlippe and I have been saying for years. (See our NoCards.org website) The article below about the "new" HP retail assistant says it pretty plainly, too:

"The system offers retail marketers granular control over the number of items that they can sell, and allows them to provide discounts to their most loyal and profitable customers."

Of course, offering discounts to selected, profitable customers who can afford to drop large sums at the store means no longer offering them to the customers who actually need them.

"A supermarket, for instance, could offer a discount on a steak to a customer who tends to buy expensive wine, rather than a low-income family that uses the lower prices to stock up."

I rest my case.

-Katherine Albrecht

Click "more" below to read the entire story here, or find it online here:
http://www.toptechnews.com/story.xhtml?story_id=133008V1YHDT

HP Unveils Personal Shopping Assistant
By Tom Sanders
May 30, 2007 10:43AM

HP's Retail Store Assistant allows retailers to push excess inventory by offering personalized rebate deals, and to prevent an item running out by discontinuing a promotion or even by discounting alternative products. The system offers retail marketers granular control over the number of items that they can sell.

HP Labs has unveiled a Retail Store Assistant kiosk that provides customers with a personalized shopping experience while allowing retailers to better target marketing campaigns.
The kiosk is placed inside retail stores, and customers log in with their loyalty card to access personalized offers, a shopping list and information such as instruction videos or recipes.

The system also prints out shopping lists and personalized discounts and indicates their location inside the store.

Retail Store Assistant allows retailers to push excess inventory by offering personalized rebate deals, and to prevent an item running out by discontinuing a promotion or even by discounting alternative products.

The system offers retail marketers granular control over the number of items that they can sell, and allows them to provide discounts to their most loyal and profitable customers.

A supermarket, for instance, could offer a discount on a steak to a customer who tends to buy expensive wine, rather than a low-income family that uses the lower prices to stock up.

The kiosk is a research project for now, but HP is talking to retailers about live testing. The first kiosks could show up in retail stores in about two years.

Retail marketing currently relies on printed brochures and mass media marketing campaigns.

Mohamed Dekhil, manager of retail applications at HP Labs, described the Retail Shopping Assistant's granularity as a bricks-and-mortar version of Google's AdSense online advertising program.

The in-store kiosks also offer HP a way to differentiate its products in an age in which PC and server makers compete solely on price, according to Dekhil.

"If you go to a retailer and tell them that you have the biggest and fastest server in the world it is not really exciting for them," he said at a meeting with reporters at HP Labs in Palo Alto, California.

"The question is what can it do for the retailer? How is it going to enhance the loyalty of its customers?"

HP also envisions itself as a trusted third party between store operators and the makers of brand name products. As a retailer's brands often compete with brand name products, the two are often reluctant to share sales information.

The kiosks are just part of what HP sees as a future shopping experience spanning Web sites and mobile devices.

A store could also opt for a model equipped with a camera, allowing shoppers to scan an article and talk to a specialized salesperson who can answer questions and offer tips on how to use the item.

This is important because the average staff turnover rate for retail stores can reach six months for entry-level employees and 18 months for managers. This makes specialized knowledge about products a rare and expensive commodity.

Posted by Katherine Albrecht at 8:10 AM | Comments (0)